For the two bugs. I'll try looking into the changelog on the deb package and see if By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. to your account, Hello The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. I cannot boot into Ventoy with Secure Boot enabled on my machine though, it only boots when I disable Secure Boot in BIOS. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Okay, I installed linux mint 64 bit on this laptop before. 6. Ventoy doesn't load the kernel directly inside the ISO file(e.g. Format NTFS in Windows: format x: /fs:ntfs /q The easiest thing to do if you don't have a UEFI-bootable Memtest86 ISO is to extract the \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.efi file and just copy that to your Ventoy drive. I should also note that the key used in Ventoy is the same used in Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk, my key. You signed in with another tab or window. No bootfile found for UEFI! In that case there's no difference in booting from USB or plugging in a SATA or NVMe drive with the same content as you'd put on USB (and we can debate about intrusion detection if you want). Some known process are as follows: You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. 1.0.84 AA64 www.ventoy.net ===> @chromer030 hello. also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* Tried the same ISOs in Easy2Boot and they worked for me. Hey, I have encountered the same problem and I found that after deleting the "System Volume Information" folder on Ventoy partition of the USB disk, it can boot now. Just some of my thoughts: - . Boots, but cannot find root device. Any suggestions, bugs? Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. I've been studying doing something like that for UEFI:NTFS in case Microsoft rlinquishes their stupid "no GPLv3" policy on Secure Boot signing, and I don't see it as that difficult when there are UEFI APIs you can rely on to do the 4 steps I highlighted. That's an improvement, I guess? When user whitelist Venoy that means they trust Ventoy (e.g. Do I still need to display a warning message? On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error. Yes. So if the ISO doesn't support UEFI mode itself, the boot will fail. It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU. Most of modern computers come with Secure Boot enabled by default, which is a requirement for Windows 10 certification process. all give ERROR on my PC Click Bootable > Load Boot File. Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . Strelec WinPE) Ctrl+r for ventoy debug mode Ctrl+h or h for help m checksum a file debes activar modo uefi en el bios It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. If everything is fine, I'll prepare the repo, prettify the code and write detailed compilation and usage instructions, as well as help @ventoy with integration. Must hardreset the System. pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2020.0_p20200527.iso - 4 GB, avg_arl_cdi_all_120_160420a12074.iso - 178 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200419.n.0.iso - 1.80 GB Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. Yes. Sorry for the late test. OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===> It says that no bootfile found for uefi. You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. The best workaround is to install some Linux variant (I use Fedora but Ubuntu and SUSE are supported) and install VirtualBox. Also tested on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 16GB OK (UEFI64). Sign in the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? Just create a FAT32 partition, change its label to ARCH_YYYYMM (fill in the ISO's date, now it would be ARCH_202109) and extract the Arch ISO to it. You literally move files around and use a text editor to edit theme.text, ventoy.json, and so on. I would say that it probably makes sense to first see what LoadImage()/StarImage() let through in an SB enabled environment (provided that this is what Ventoy/GRUB uses behind the scenes, which I'm not too sure about), and then decide if it's worth/possible to let users choose to run unsigned bootloaders. No. Discovery and usage of shim protocol of loaded shim binary for global UEFI validation functions (validation policy override with shim verification), Shim protocol unregistration of loaded shim binary (to prevent confusion among shims of multiple vendors and registration of multiple protocols which are handled by different chainloaded shims). 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Could you please also try via BIOS/Legacy mode? and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) Forum rules Before you post please read how to get help. I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. always used Archive Manager to do this and have never had an issue. The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. Also ZFS is really good. There are many suggestion to use tools which make an ISO bootable with UEFI on a flash disk, however it's not that easy as you can only do that with UEFI-enabled ISO's. By UEFI enabled ISO's I mean that the ISO files contain a BOOT\EFI directory with a EFI bootloader. Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. GRUB mode fixed it! However, considering that in the case of Ventoy, you are basically going to chain load GRUB 2, and that most of the SHIMs have been designed to handle precisely that, it might be easier to get Ventoy accepted as a shim payload. ? No! BUT with Ventoy 1.0.74 legacy boot from the same ISO I get a black square in centre of menu (USB LED is flashing so appears to load). Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 - 1.95 GB, guix-system-install-1.1.0.x86_64-linux.iso - 550 MB, ipfire-2.25.x86_64-full-core143.iso - 280 MB, SpringdaleLinux-8.1-x86_64-netinst.iso - 580 MB, Acronis.True.Image.2020.v24.6.1.25700.Boot.CD.iso - 690 MB, O-O.BlueCon.Admin.17.0.7024.WinPE.iso - 480 MB, adelie-live-x86_64-1.0-rc1-20200202.iso - 140 MB, fhclive-USB-2019.02_kernel-4.4.178_amd64.iso - 450 MB, MiniTool.Partition.Wizard.Technician.WinPE.11.5.iso - 390 MB, AOMEI.Backupper.Technician.Plus.5.6.0_UEFI.iso - 380 MB, O-O.DiskImage.Professional.14.0.321.WinPE.iso - 380 MB, EaseUS.Data.Recovery.Wizard.WinPE.13.2.iso - 390 MB, Active.Boot.Disk.15.0.6.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Active.Data.Studio.15.0.0.Boot.Disk.x64.iso - 550 MB, EASEUS.Partition.Master.13.5.Technician.Edition.WinPE.x64.iso - 500 MB, Macrium_Reflect_Workstation_PE_v7.2.4797.iso - 280 MB, Paragon.Hard.Disk.Manager.Advanced.17.13.1.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB, orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB, rocksolid-signage-release-installer-1.13.4-1.iso - 1.3 GB, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso - 3 GB, OpenStage-2020.03-xfce4-x86_64.iso - 1.70 GB, resilientlinux-installer-amd64-2.2.iso - 2.20 GB, virage-beowulf-3.0-x86-64-UEFI-20191110_1146.iso - 1.30 GB, BlackWeb-Unleashed.19.11-amd64.hybrid.iso - 3 GB, yunohost-stretch-3.6.4.6-amd64-stable.iso - 400 MB, OpenMandrivaLx.4.2-snapshot-plasma.x86_64.iso - 2.10 GB openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB @ventoy @pbatard Correct me if I'm wrong, but even with physical access, the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? In the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe. You can copy several ISO files at a time, and Ventoy will offer a boot menu where you can select them. slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. 3. Rename it as MemTest86_64.efi (or something similar). Then the process of reading your "TPM-secured" disk becomes as easy as: User awareness that their encrypted data was read: Nil. Ventoy does support Windows 10 and 11 and users can bypass the Windows 11 hardware check when installing. Thank you 4. ^^ maybe a lenovo / thinkpad / thinkcentre issue ? 2. Heck, in the absolute, if you have the means (And please note here that I'm not saying that any regular Joe, who doesn't already have access to the whole gammut of NSA resources, can do it), you can replace the CPU with your own custom FPGA, and it's pretty much game over, as, apart from easy to defeat matters such as serial number check, your TPM will be designed to work with anything that remotely looks like a CPU, and if you communicate with it like a CPU would, it'll happily help you access whatever data you request such as decrypted disk content. Reboot your computer and select ventoy-delete-key-1.-iso. Installation & Boot. Even though I copied the Windows 10 ISO to flash drive, which presumably has a UEFI boot image on it, neither of my Vostros would recognize it. Another issue about Porteus and Aporteus : if we copy ISO via dd or other tools or copy ISO contents to EFI partition of USB work perfectly in UEFI. Just right-click on "This PC" on the desktop, select "Manage", and click on "Disk Management . Is there a way to force Ventoy to boot in Legacy mode? Thanks! Please follow the guid bellow. TPM encryption has historically been independent of Secure Boot. Then I can directly add them to the tested iso list on Ventoy website. to your account, Hi ! However what currently happens is that people who do have Secure Boot enabled will currently not be alerted to these at all. Will there be any? Please refer github issue/1975, x86 Legacy BIOS, IA32 UEFI, x86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all What matters is what users perceive and expect. Just like what is the case with Ventoy, I don't have much of an issue with having some leeway, on account that implementing proper signature validation requires some effort, during which unsigned bootloaders may be accepted, so as not inconvenience users too much. "No bootfile found for UEFI! They boot from Ventoy just fine. Menu Option-->Secure Boot Support for Ventoy2Disk.exe and -s option for Ventoy2Disk.sh 2.-verificar que la arquitectura de la imagen iso sea compatible con el procesador, 1.-modo uefi: Have a question about this project? Delete or rename the \EFI folder on the VTOYEFI partition 2 of the Ventoy drive. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh. Option 2: bypass secure boot In this case you must take care about the list and make sure to select the right disk. Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI Now that Ventoy is installed on your USB drive, you can create a bootable USB drive by simply copying some ISO files onto the USB, no matter if they are Linux distribution ISOs or Windows 10 / 8 / 7 ISO files. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' 1.0.84 BIOS www.ventoy.net ===> DSAService.exe (Intel Driver & Support Assistant). I can confirm it was the reason for some ISOs to not boot (ChimeraOS, Manjaro Gnome). md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. If you allow someone physical access to your Secure Boot-enabled system, and you have not disabled USB booting in the BIOS (or booting from CD\DVD), then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. You can install Ventoy to USB drive, Removable HD, SD Card, SATA HDD, SSD, NVMe . For Hiren's BootCD HBCD_PE_x64.iso has been tested in UEFI mode. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. Tested on 1.0.77. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" hello everyone Using ventoy, if I try to install the ISO. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. puedes poner cualquier imagen en 32 o 64 bits Keep reading to find out how to do this. I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. Some commands in Ventoy grub can modify the contents of the ISO and must be disabled for users to use on their own under secure boot. size: 589 (617756672 byte) Won't it be annoying? It seems the original USB drive was bad after all. /s. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. That's actually very hard to do, and IMO is pointless in Ventoy case. I didn't add an efi boot file - it already existed; I only referenced mishab_mizzunet 1 yr. ago The current release of Slax (slax-64bit-11.2.1.iso) fails to boot using UEFI64 using ventoy with the error message: Yes, I already understood my mistake. Tested on ASUS K40IN | 5 GB, void-live-x86_64-20191109-xfce.iso | 780 MB, refracta10-beta5_xfce_amd64-20200518_0033.iso | 800 MB, devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso | 1.10 GB, drbl-live-xfce-2.6.2-1-amd64.iso | 800 MB, kali-linux-2020-W23-live-amd64.iso | 2.88 GB, blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso | 14 GB, cucumber-linux-1.1-x86_64-basic.iso | 630 MB, BlankOn-11.0.1-desktop-amd64.iso | 1.8 GB, openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20200614.x86_64.iso | 1.9 GB, sol-11_3-text-x86.iso | 600 MB But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. But it shouldn't be to the user to do that. It woks only with fallback graphic mode. This solution is only for Legacy BIOS, not UEFI. EFI Blocked !!!!!!! I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. Is it valid for Ventoy to be able to run user scripts, inject user files into Linux/Windows ram disks, change .cfg files in 'secure' ISOs, etc. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. Ventoy supports both BIOS Legacy and UEFI, however, some ISO files do not support UEFI mode. regular-cinnamon-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.1 GB, openSUSE-Tumbleweed-GNOME-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 852MB Test these ISO files with Vmware firstly. Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. You can change the type or just delete the partition. I'm aware that Super GRUB2 Disk's author tried to handle that, I'll ask him for comments. If it fails to do that, then you have created a major security problem, no matter how you look at it. For instance, it could be that only certain models of PC have this problem with certain specific ISOs. It works for me if rename extension to .img - tested on a Lenovo IdeaPad 300. (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). However, after adding firmware packages Ventoy complains Bootfile not found. The only way to prevent misuse when booting from USB is to set a BIOS password (and perhaps a boot password), set the BIOS to not boot from USB and it won't hurt to also use an encrypted filesystem for the OS on the hard disk (bitlocker/LUKS). Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. list vol - select vol of EFI (in my case nr 14) as illustrated - assign - EFI drive is mounted as Q: Also possible is: After booting with Win10XPE from RAMDISK the Hidden EFI Driv ElementaryOS boots just fine. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. ", https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB Feedback is welcome If your tested hardware or image file is not listed here, please tell me and I will be glad to add it to the table here. Getting the same error as @rderooy. privacy statement. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-KDE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 952MB There are many other applications that can create bootable disks but Ventoy comes with its sets of features. I am just resuming my work on it. when the user Secure Boots via MokManager - even when booting signed efi files of Ubuntu or Windows? @ventoy The latest version of the open source tool Ventoy supports an option to bypass the Windows 11 requirements check during installation of the operating system. You can have BIOS with TPM and disk encryption and, provided your hardware manufacturer implements anti tampering protection to ensure that the TPM is not sharing data it shouldn't share with parts of the system that should not be trusted, it should be no less secure than TPM-based encryption on a Secure Boot enabled system. With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. EDIT: Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. Newbie. It . They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. This means current is UEFI mode. Insert a USB flash drive with at least 8 GB of storage capacity into your computer. The main issue is that users should at least get some warning that a bootloader failed SB validation when SB is enabled, instead of just letting everything go through. Not associated with Microsoft. 1.0.84 IA32 www.ventoy.net ===> () no boot file found for uefi. UEFI Secure Boot (SB) is a verification mechanism for ensuring that code launched by a computer's UEFI firmware is trusted. Agreed. Then your life is simplified to Persistence management while each of the 2 (Ventoy or SG2D) provide the ability to boot Windows if it is installed on any local .