Her experiences are offered by the filmmakers to illustrate the film's scientifically-unsupported thesis about quantum physics and consciousness. While many of its interviewees and subjects are professional scientists in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, one of them has noted that the film quotes him out of context. Film / What the #$*! He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. Ive not seen the movie, and dont intend to, but David Alberts book on Quantum Mechanics and Experience is one of the best things Ive read on the interpretation of QM. But they add that the film shows quantum mysteries selectively to shore up metaphysical points. After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. However, it contends that the empty space is not that empty, it is only the human mind that is unable to see beyond the emptiness. Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. Extreme quantum mechanics could be the name of the speciality of SF writer (and physicist) Greg Egan. But quantum mechanics rules out the possibility of hidden variables. It was amusing when John Hagelin tried to run for US president representing the Natural Law party during the 1990s. Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. You can be accurate in one or the other, but not in both. The web makes all such things available today, so I can give you a Google link to a page about Maharishis unified field theory, http://www.worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility6.html. I want to mention another point Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". Only the Shaman knows, and we're about 500 years too late to ask him. Staff meetings are tedious enough give me a conscious mind with a decent filter device any day. The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" Having watched this travesty of a movie, any real scientist worth his quarks might be gun-shy about joining the debate. Hope you dont mind me butting in, just thought you might like to see these facts which are so far undisputed about the film. We all know most parts of the ocean are still undiscovered but there's plenty of theories. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it. Our work isn't possible without your support. The general idea was that since quantum mechanics supposedly says that there isnt one reality, but an infinite number of possibilities, one just has to be enlightened to an awareness of this, and then you can make whatever you want happen. ", Critics offered mixed reviews as seen on the film review website Rotten Tomatoes, where it scored a "Rotten" 34% score with an average score of 4.6/10, based on 77 reviews. A lot of the propaganda from them was hilarious, especially whenever candidates attempted to hold public speeches and performing demonstrations of yogic flying. The whole thing is really moronic beyond belief. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific. According to an article in Fortean Times by David Hambling, the origins of this story likely involved the voyages of Captain James Cook, not Columbus, and an account related by Robert Hughes which said Cook's ships were "complex and unfamiliar as to defy the natives' understanding". [5], According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of "fuck". When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too." With Alejandro Jodorowsky, Horacio Salinas, Zamira Saunders, Juan Ferrara. log out. [5] Foreign gross added another $5 million for a worldwide gross of nearly $16 million. As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. This will be revisited if any. extrapolates from quantum physics to answer life's big questions. That's not the case. The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable. So what better thing to have than something that gives you everything you want? (I haven't). Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us? Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. 3. The main thing to know is that "observation" is a bad word for the process which goes on which we have inherited from the days when quantum mechanics was first discovered, and is unfortunately a bit easier to teach in introductory courses than decoherence. [17] Eric Scerri in a review for Committee for Skeptical Inquiry dismisses it as "a hodgepodge of all kinds of crackpot nonsense," where "science [is] distorted and sensationalized". Present thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but,. In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. Prominent if you go by citations that is. The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. 2004 ( ) ( ) Offline 2013. Water beamed messages of love or gratitude formed itself into lovely snowflake-like crystals; water exposed to the words "You make me sick" looks like the surface of a toxic waste pond. ", "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific experiments, notes Bruce Schumm, a particle physicist at the University of California at Santa Cruz. He announced in 1994 (one year after the study) that violent crime had decreased 18%. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case forPluto.". We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Science Fiction, Comedy, Drama, Documentary, Fantasy, Special Interest There's nothing wrong with that. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? Right after the Velvet Revolution in 1989 (the collapse of the Czechoslovak communism), many new spiritual and other directions were trying to find their ways to the new free countries. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. A movie and a book said that water molecules are. Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." The flip side of that is that you can use quantum mechanics, again in specially prepared systems, to communicate in a way that will allow us to know when someone is eavesdropping. : Down the Rabbit Hole: Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. Adapted from "Ask the Everyday Scientist" with permission of the writer. [12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". We use it to assign probabilities to possible measurement outcomes on the basis of actual measurement outcomes. (stylized as What t #$*! They were showing us the pictures of the waves converging to a point a meditation trick and this picture had a caption explaining that the unified field theory has already been found. All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. The brain wasn't born yesterday. In addition, the film mentioned clipper ships which were not even in existence at that time. We'd like to be able to influence things just by thinking about them, we'd like to transport ourselves elsewhere without getting on an airplane. Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. Sol. you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. Happy Water Crystals Debunked as PseudoScience June 23rd, 2018 - Are Dr Masaru Emoto?s Fantastic Claims Actually Real Via is masaru emoto . As he told ABC's "This Week" the day after the debate: "When it . You are free to comment as you wish. The comments focus primarily on a single theme: "We create our own reality." One other area where quantum mechanics works on a macroscopic scale is in superconductivity and superfluidity. It was the biggest bunch of garbage that I had ever seen. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." Producing, scripting, and co-directing the film, What the BLEEP went on to become a global phenomenon, with well over 100 million viewers experiencing the BLEEP. I suggest to read him if you want to know how QM is perceived in the SF community. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:I'm citing \"Fair Use\" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdfAlso \"Fair Dealing\" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4ahttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4Censorship is NOT a valid argument.This is the first part of my critical analysis of \"What The Bleep Do We Know?! Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU [2]. One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. The figures are a bit rubbery, but the idea that we're only 'aware' of a fraction of our brain's activity is both correct and a huge relief. is a 2004 American pseudo-scientific film that posits a spiritual connection between quantum physics and consciousness. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle argues that its impossible to track the momentum and position of a subatomic particle. [4], Lacking the funding and resources of the typical Hollywood film, the filmmakers relied on "guerrilla marketing" first to get the film into theaters, and then to attract audiences. Beyond fear, beyond anger. The researchers' bottom line: Quantum physics is about matter at its most fundamental levels and matter's interactions; it's not about spirituality. or call us at 1-617-450-2300. suggest that science allows you to capitalize on quantum possibilities, but theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says it's just a load of bleep. The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . I guess it's a sign that quantum physics is entering the mainstream A: Well, yeah, the point is that there have been these new-age desires for lots of things to make the world better: crystals, energy vortices. Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. Krauss worries that a lot of people can be fooled by appeals to the admittedly weird world of quantum physics a world in which particles are said to take every possible path from point A to point B, in which the position and velocity of particles are necessarily cloaked in uncertainty, in which the mere act of observation changes the thing being observed. As one of the film's characters gushes early in the proceedings, 'The moment we acknowledge the quantum self, we say that somebody has become enlightened'. Dr Joao Migueijo is reader in theoretical physics at Imperial College, London.What the Bleep Do We Know!? you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. So you forgive the film's jelly-baby graphics, daggy storyline, and that Gabor sister channelling a warrior spirit from Atlantis. As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders . About. subscription. They want suggestions, not formulas. If you have questions about your account, please Not exactly, Amit. It's actually the machine that's the observer, not the human who's jotting down results. The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. So far, so good. Presentations ranging from "The Secret" to "What the Bleep Do We Know?" But above a tiny size range, quantum properties collapse, and particles start to behave in the way described by classical physics - more like bowling balls than fuzzy clouds of "wave functions. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie, Robert Bailey Jr.. A fictional photographer's quest to spiritually rediscover herself is interspersed with documentary footage of scientists and theologians discussing the philosophical aspects of quantum physics. To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us so, in a leap of creatively edited logic 3. She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! 6. Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. This website uses cookies to In fact, "you are God in the making," which explains why Shirley MacLaine is a Ramtha fan. As the discussion moves from science to pop psychology, the film s endorsement of Ramtha s School Of Enlightenment and its simplistic self-improvement mantra becomes clear.